N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, A.K.SARKAR, K.C.DAS GUPTA, K.N.WANCHOO, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR
Kailash Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
DAS GUPTA, J. : The appellant, a clerk in the service of the East Indian Railways was compulsorily retired from service with effect from June 30, 1948, on attaining the age of 55 years. His prayer for further retention in service on the ground that he was entitled to be retained under R. 2046/2 of the Railway Establishment code having been rejected he brought the suit which has given rise to this appeal in the court of the Civil Judge, Lucknow, alleging that he was entitled to be retained under the above rule and the order for compulsory retirement on attaining the age of 55 years was void and inoperative in law. He accordingly prayed for a declaratory decree that the order of his compulsory retirement was illegal and void and for a money decree for arrears of pay on the basis that he had continued in service.
2. The main defence was a denial of his right to be retained in service under the rules. The Trial Court accepted the plaintiff s contention as regards the effect of the rule, gave him a declaration as prayed for and also decreed the claim for money in part.
3. On appeal the High Court took a different view of R. 2046 and held that that rule gave the plaintiff no right
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.