SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 104

J.C.SHAH, J.L.KAPUR
Lokmanya Mills Barsi – Appellant
Versus
Barsi Borough Municipality, Barsi – Respondent


Advocates:
A.G.Ratnaparkhi, A.V.VISHWANATHA SASTRI, AVADH BIHARI ROHTAGI, B.P.MAHESHVARI, S.T.DESAI

Judgment

SHAH, J. : These five appeals raise a common question about the validity of R. 2C framed by the respondent-the Municipality of Barsi under S. 58(j) of the Bombay Municipal Boroughts Act,1925-hereinafter called the Act. The Lokmanya Mills- hereinafter called the appellants-are a company registered under the Indian Companies Act holding an extensive area of land City Survey No. 2554 within the Municipal Borough on which are constructed buildings of the factory, warehouses, bungalows and other structures appurtenant to the factory. The respondent, a Borough Municipality constituted under the Act is by S. 73, entitled to levy a rate on lands and buildings and also a water-rate. Under the rules framed by the Municipality, house-tax and water-tax were levied on buildings and non-agricultural lands on their annual letting value at uniform rates whether the purpose was residential, business or manufacturing.

2. In 1944, the Municipality resolved to enhance the assessment of lands and buildings within its area. After some correspondence with the Commissioner Central Division, the General Body of the Municipality resolved that the rental value for levying rates on mills and factories
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top