SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 188

J.C.SHAH, J.L.KAPUR, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, M.HIDAYATULLAH, S.K.DAS, S.R.DASS
Pandit Kishan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ganpat Ram Khosia – Respondent


Advocates:
REFERRED TO : W.H.King v. Republic of India, AIR 1952 SC 15

Judgment

SHAH, J. : The Singer Sewing Machine Company -hereinafter referred to as the company - was, since the year 1934, the tenant for business purposes of a shop situate at Gurgaon in the State of Punjab and belonging to Pandit Kishan Lal-hereinafter called the appellant. One Ganpat Ram Khosla - hereinafter referred to as Khosla -was the Sales Manager of the Company.

2. The Legislature of the State of East Punjab enacted Act III of 1949 called the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act.1949, to restrict the increase of rent of certain premises situated within the limits of urban areas and the eviction of tenants therefrom. The Act granted protection to tenants of premises used for residential and non-residential purposes. By S. 2. cl. (i), the expression "tenancy" was defined, in so far as the definition is material, as meaning any person by whom or on whose account rent was payable for a building or rented land and included a tenant continuing in possession after the termination of the tenancy in his favour, but did not include a person placed in occupation of a building or rented land by its tenant, unless with the consent of the landlord .....By S. 13, the right of the landlord










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top