A.K.SARKAR, K.N.WANCHOO, N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, K.C.DAS GUPTA, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR
Madan Lal Arora – Appellant
Versus
Excise And Taxation Officer, Amritsar – Respondent
Judgment
SARKAR, J. : The petitioner is a dealer registered under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act. He filed returns of his sale turnovers for the four quarters of the financial year ending on March 31, 1955, and likewise, for the four quarters of the financial year ending on March 31, 1956. In respect of each year the Sales Tax Assessing Officer served three successive notices on him on March, 7, 1958, April 4, 1958, and August 18, 1959, requiring him to attend with the documents and other evidence in support of his returns. In the last of the notices mentioned above it was stated that on failure to produce the documents and other evidence mentioned, the case would be decided "on best judgment assessment basis." The petitioner did not comply with any of the notices, but after the receipt of the last notice he presented this petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution challenging the right of the authorities to make a best judgment assessment.
2. The question raised by the petitioner turns on S. 11 of the Punjab General Sales tax Act, relevant provisions of which are set out below.
S. 11. (1) If the Assessing Authority is satisfied without requiring the presence of registered dealer or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.