SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 191

K.SUBBA RAO, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
Ram Chandra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.DATTA, B.B.TAVAKLEY, R.C.Prasad, S.P.Varma

Judgment

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J. : This appeal, by special leave, is against the order of the Patna High Court dismissing the appellant s appeal against his conviction for offences under S. 161, I. P. C., and S. 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (Act II of 1947), hereinafter called the Act.

2. The appellant was the Construction Engineer at Sindhri. R. B. Basu was a contractor living in Calcutta and carrying on the business of the company named and styled the Hindustan Engineering & Construction Company. The prosecution alleged, and the Courts below have found, that the appellant accepted the sum of Rs. 10,000 as illegal gratification from Basu at the Kelner s Restaurant at Dhanbad Railway Station on July 18, 1951.

3. The Courts disbelieved the appellant s defence that he had taken the envelope containing this amount not knowing that it contained this amount, but knowing that it contained papers relating to Basu s contracts.

4. The contentions raised on behalf of the appellant are : (i) that the provisions regarding the presumption contained in S. 4 of the Act are unconstitutional; (ii) that the case was tried by the Special Judge who had no jurisdiction to try it; (iii) that th























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top