SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(SC) 344

A.K.SARKAR, S.K.DAS, S.R.DASS, J.R.MUDHOLKAR, N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR
State Of Bombay – Appellant
Versus
S. L. Apte – Respondent


Advocates:
H.R.KHANNA, N.S.BINDRA, R.H.Dhebar

Judgment

AYYANGAR, J. : This appeal on a certificate under Art. 134(1) of the Constitution granted by the High Court of Bombay, principally raises for consideration the application and scope of Art. 20(2) of the Constitution and S. 26 of the General Clauses Act.

2. The facts necessary for the appreciation of the points involved in this appeal are few and may be briefly stated. The two respondents-S. L. Apte and Miss Dwarkabai Bhat-were respectively the Managing Director, and the Managing Director of the Women s department, of an Insurance company by name "The Long Life Insurance Company which had its headquarters at Poona.. A power of attorney had been executed by the company in favour of the first respondent in June, 1942, under which he was vested with the power, control and possession inter alia of the moneys belonging to the company with a view to have them invested in proper securities. The second respondent as Managing Director also acted under another power of attorney executed by the company in her favour in or about June, 1942, and by virtue thereof she was assisting the first respondent in maintaining the accounts of the company. While the respondents were thus functioning









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top