SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(SC) 309

J.C.SHAH, J.L.KAPUR, M.HIDAYATULLAH
C. A. Abraham – Appellant
Versus
Income-tax Officer, Kottayam – Respondent


Advocates:
D.GUTPA, G.B.PAI, HARDYAL HARDY, SARDAR BAHADUR SAHARYA

Judgment

SHAH, J. : C. A. Abraham hereinafter referred to as the appellant and one M.P. Thomas carried on business in food grains in partnership in the name and style of M. P. Thomas & Company at Kottayam. M. P. Thomas died on October 11, 1949. For the account years 1123, 1124 and 1125 M. E. corresponding to August 1947-July 1948, August 1948-July 1949 and August 1949-July 1950, the appellant submitted as a partner returns of the income of the firm as an unregistered firm. In the course of the assessment proceedings, it was discovered that the firm had carried on transactions in different commodities in fictitious names and had failed to disclose substantial income earned therein. By order dated November 29, 1954, the Income Tax Officer assessed the suppressed income of the firm in respect of the assessment year 1124 M.E. under the Travancore Income Tax Act and in respect of assessment years 1949-50 and 1950-51 under the Indian Income Tax Act and on the same day issued notices under S. 28 of the Indian Income Tax Act in respect of the years 1949-50 and 1950-51 and under S. 41 of the Travancore Income Tax Act for the year 1124 M.E., requiring the firm to show cause why penalty should














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top