SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 34

K.N.WANCHOO, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.C.DAS GUPTA
Oriol Industries – Appellant
Versus
Bombay Mercantile Bank LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

GAJENDRAGADKAR, J. : This appeal which has come to this Court with a certificate issued by the Bombay High Court raises for our decision a short and interesting question about the scope and effect of the provisions contained in S. 89 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, in relation to the law of banking. This question arises in this way. The appellant the Oriol Industries, Ltd., (hereafter called the company) was incorporated on May 15, 1945, and it appointed as its managing agents M/s. Poddar Chacko & Co. Soon after its incorporation the company passed a resolution on May 21, 1945, whereby it decided to open an account with the respondent, the Bombay Mercantile Bank. Ltd., (hereafter called the bank) and in accordance with the said resolution an account was opened with it on May 28, 1945. Twentyeight cheques were drawn on this account aggregating the total amount of Rs. 28,882-13-0 during the period between May 28, 1945 and July 31,1945 These cheques were drawn by K. Poddar and M. J. Chacko in pursuance of the authority conferred on them by the company. On September 28, 1948, by its liquidator the company brought the present suit claiming to recover from the bank the said am




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top