J.C.SHAH, S.R.DASS, M.HIDAYATULLAH
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry – Respondent
Judgment
HIDAYATULLAH, I. : The assessee, who is the respondent here, had received on July 20, 1946 a sum of Rs. 40,000. In the proceedings for assessment for the assessment year, 1946-47, this came to the notice of the Income-tax Officer. Since the receipt fell within the accounting year relative to the assessment year, 1947-48, the Income-tax Officer did not assess the amount, making a note, "The question will however be considered again at the time of 1947- 48 assessment." In the return filed for the assessment year,1947-48, this amount was not shown by the assessee. The Income-tax Officer also overlooked the note at the end of his order in the back year s assessment, with the result that this item was omitted. The assessee appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner against his assessment for the year, 1947-48. While the appeal was pending, the Income-tax Officer wrote a letter to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner intimating him that he would like to be present, and also requesting him to assess the amount of Rs. 40,000. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner, after issuing notice, assessed the amount and included it in the original assessment. The contention of the assess
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.