SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 39

M.HIDAYATULLAH, J.C.SHAH
Bipat Cope – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.NAG, B.K.BANERJEE, P.K.CHATTERJI, S.P.Varma, SARJU PRASAD

Judgment

HIDAYATULLAH, J. : This is an appeal by special leave against an order of the High Court of Patna, which an order passed by the Magistrate, First Class, discharging the appellants under S. 207A (6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure was set aside, and the Magistrate was directed to commit the appellants to the Court of Session to stand their trial under Ss. 307/34 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code. The only question that is argued is whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the order of the Magistrate, which, it is claimed, was passed in the proper exercise of the jurisdiction conferred by S. 207A (6) of the Code.

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are as follows : On March 26,1959, at about 10-15 p.m. one Rajbahadur Rai alias Chhote Rai, was alleged to have been assaulted by the appellants at a place where Chhote Rai was sitting, at the pan shop of one Raghunath Prasad. The appellants are said to have arrived there in a private car and a tandem, and after assaulting Chhote Rai, to have gone away in these two vehicles. After investigation, the appellants were prosecuted under Ss. 307/34 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code, with the result already mentioned.

3. Before












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top