SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 52

K.SUBBA RAO, A.K.SARKAR, K.N.WANCHOO, S.R.DASS, N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR
Board Of Revenue – Appellant
Versus
Sardarni Vidyawati – Respondent


Advocates:
A.N.GOYAL, C.P.LAL, Veda Vyasa

Judgment

WANCHOO, J. : This is an appeal on the certificate granted by the Allahabad High Court. The brief facts necessary for present purposes are these. Certain decretal moneys were deposited in the then Chief Court of Oudh at Lucknow. The respondents applied to the Chief Court for permission to withdraw the moneys on furnishing security and were permitted to do so. Thereupon a registered security bond was executed and registered in Simla in 1949 by which a house there was given in security for withdrawal of the money. Before, however the money could be withdrawn, the Inspector of Stamps reported on March 15, 1950, that the so-called security bond was in reality a mortgage deed without possession and was insufficiently stamped. He therefore reported that it should be impounded and the deficit stamp duty of Rs. 482/11/- and a penalty amounting to Rs. 4,826/14/- should be levied with respect to that document. Thereupon on April 5, 1950, the Deputy Commissioner, Kheri, acting as Collector passed the following order :

"In case the parties have any objection, they put it in writing which will be referred to the Board of Revenue."

2. It seems that on July 5,1950, the respondents objected








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top