SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 180

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
12th April, 1961
S.K. DAS, J.L. KAPUR, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH AND T.L. VENKATARAMA AYYAR, JJ.
M/s, Rajputana Textiles (Agencies) Ltd., Appellants
Versus
Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City, Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 282 of 1955,
Advocates appeared
Mr. A. V. Viswanatha Sastri, Senior Advocate, Mr. I. N. Shroff, Advocate, with him for the Appellants; Mr. K. N. Rajagopal Sastri, Senior Advocate, Mr. D. Gupta, Advocate, with him for Respondent.

Advocates:
A.V.VISHWANATHA SASTRI, D.GUTPA, I.M.SHROFF, K.N.RAJAGOPAL SASTRI

The profit from the sale of shares was taxable as it arose from an adventure in the nature of trade, where the assessee company intended to sell a portion of the shares from the outset to finance the transaction and retain the remaining shares.

Headnote:

TAXATION ON INCOME (INVESTIGATION COMMISSION) ACT, 1947 - S. 8(5) - SALE OF SHARES - WHETHER PROFIT FROM SALE OF SHARES IS TAXABLE OR CAPITAL RECEIPT - ADVENTURE IN THE NATURE OF TRADE - INTERPRETATION OF LEGAL PROVISIONS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON COURT'S DECISION.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee company purchased a block of shares from the Sassoons, along with the Managing Agency of the Apollo Mills Co. The assessee company intended to sell a portion of the shares to finance the transaction and retain the remaining shares. The assessee company sold 13,74,000 shares at a profit of Rs. 16,52,600. The question arose whether the profit from the sale of shares was taxable or a capital receipt.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court reformulated the question referred by the Investigation Commission to whether there were materials to justify the finding of the Tribunal that the transaction of purchase and sale of 13,74,000 shares was an adventure in the nature of trade and answered it in the affirmative.

Issues: 1. Whether the profit from the sale of shares was taxable or a capital receipt? 2. Whether the transaction of purchase and sale of shares was an adventure in the nature of trade?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The intention of the assessee company to sell a portion of the shares from the outset was a complete answer to the argument that the acquisition was in the nature of an investment. 2. The assessee company's purchase of shares was not with the intention of holding them, but rather to sell them at a profit to finance the completion of the transaction and secure the Managing Agency and keep 6 lacs shares. 3. The transaction had all the attributes of an adventure in the nature of trade, including the intention to make a profit, the assumption of risk, and the repetition of the transaction.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the High Court's decision was upheld.

Judgment

KAPUR, J. : This is an appeal against the judgment and order of the High Court of Bombay in a reference wider S, 8(5) of the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act (Act XXX of 1947), hereinafter termed the Act . The assessee company was the applicant before High Court and is the appellant before us and the Commissioner of income-tax Bombay City, was the respondent in the High Court and is the respondent here also. Being a reference under S. 8(5) of the Act, it was heard and decided by three judges of the High Court.

2. The assessee company is a private limited company which was incorporated on May 6, 1943, with a paid up capital of Rs. 20 lacs. It was promoted by two group of persons who for sake of convenience may be called the Morarka Group and the Bubna Group . The Apollo Mills Co., Ltd. of Bombay with a capital of Rs. 50 lacs divided into 25 lacs shares of Rs. 2 each, had as its Managing Agents M/s. E. D. Sassoon & Co. Ltd., who for the sake of brevity will be referred to in this judgment as the Sassoons . They held 19,76,000 shares out of the 25 lacs. The promoters of the assessee company entered into an agreement with the sasoons on April 27, 1943, by which the Sassoons agreed to transfer their Managing Agency in the Mill Co. for Rs. 12 1/2 lacs to the promoters of the assessee company and the whole of their holding of 19,76,000 shares. at Rs.4/4/0 per share, i.e., for Rs. 83,98,000. These shares were to be transferred to the promoters or to the company which they were proposing to float. By clause (3) of this agreement the sale of the Managing Agency and the transfer of the shares was to be simultaneously completed and neither party could require the, completion of the one without the other. On November 1, 1943, a tripartite agreement was entered into between the Sassoons as Assignors, the promoters of the completion of the one without the other On November 1,1943, tripartite agreement was entered into between the Sassoons as Assignors, the promoters of the company as Confirming Parties and the assessee company as Assignees. By that agreement the Managing Agency rights were formally transferred to the assessee company so also the Share Certificates for the whole of holding of the Sassoons in the Mill co, and the necessary blank transfer deeds were delivered.

3. Before the agreement of April 27, 1943, and during the course of negotiations with the sassoons the promoters of the assessee company entered into an arrangement with some share brokers for the sale of a large portion of the total holding of 19,76,000 shares of the MilI Co. The price of there shares varied from Rs. 5/8/- to Rupees 5/13/- In all 10,00,000 shares out of the total holding of the Mill co. were sold to these brokers, and they in turn sold these block of shares in smaller lots to a number of purchasers Some shares were sold later; 1,20,000 shares were transferred to 13 nominees of the Morarka Group at cost price. As a result of sale of all these 13,74,000 shares the assessee company received a sum of Rs.16,52,600 excess over the purchase price. The remaining shares the assessee company retained, the assessee company submitted that the profits of the entire holding of the shares had not been Worked out and had therefore not been transferred to the profit and loss account.

4. The assessee company was taxed by the Income tax officer but the sum of Rs. 16,52,600 which was the excess of the sale price over the purchase price of 13,74,000 shares was held not to be profit and therefore not taxable. When the Act came into force the case of the assessee company was referred to the Investigation Commission by the Central Government and the Investigation Commission made its report on November 9,1949, in Case No. 406A. By this report the Commission directed that appropriate assessment be made under the Indian Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1945-46 and the Excess Profits Tax Act for the corresponding chargeable accounting period.

5. At
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top