SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 281

P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.SUBBA RAO, M.HIDAYATULLAH
Senior Electric Inspector – Appellant
Versus
Laxminaray Chopra – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, DIPAK DATTA CHAUDHURI, P.D.MENON, P.K.BOSH, P.K.CHATTERJI

Judgment

SUBBA RAO, J. : This appeal raises the question of construction of the expression "telegraph line" in S. 34(2)(b) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (Act 9 of 1910), (hereinafter called the Act).

2. The first respondent, Laxmi Narayan Chopra, carries on business as motor coach builder under the name and style of "Chopra Motors having his factory at 139, Regent Park, Tollygunge in the suburbs of Calcutta. In the said factory a number of "Universal Electric Motors" are operated for the purpose of working electric drills. Within a distance of 100 feet of the said factory, there is a Post and Telegraph Wireless Station, which besides functioning as a coast station communicating with ships at sea, handles public messages in large volume from Darjeeling, Shillong, Gauhati, Agartala and New Delhi. In or about April, 1953, severe electrical interference was observed in the said station and experts attributed the same to local induction from the first respondent s factory. On October 13, 1953, the Senior Electric Inspector issued a notice to the first respondent to show cause in writing as to why an order under S. 34(2)(b) of the Act, read with notification No. 4193-COM dated Augu


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top