SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 240

J.C.SHAH, J.L.KAPUR, K.SUBBA RAO, M.HIDAYATULLAH, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
Shriram Jhunjhunwala – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bombay – Respondent


Judgment

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J. : This appeal, by special leave, is against the order of the High Court of Judicature at Nagpur, dismissing the petition of the appellant under Art. 226 of the Constitution.

2. On August 9, 1950, the appellant applied to the State Government, Madhya Pradesh for the grant of a prospecting licence for manganese ore over an area of 83.18 acres, comprising khasra No. 1 of mouza Seoni Bhondki. The State Government granted the prospecting licence for this area on June 18, 1951, and intimated that the prospecting licence form which was pending approval by the Union Government, would be executed in due course.

3. On April 21, 1951, respondent No. 3 applied for the grant of mining lease over 32 acres out of the aforesaid area of 83.18 acres. On October 20, 1951, the State Government informed him that that area had been already granted to the appellant under prospecting licence, and it was not available to him.

4. On November 26, 1951, respondent No. 3 applied for review to the Union Government under Rule 57 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949.

5. On September 5, 1952, the Union Government wrote to the State Government that its order regarding the grant of prospectin










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top