SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.K. DAS, J.L. KAPUR, A.K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH AND RAGHUBAR DAYAL, JJ.
Burmah Shell oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Ltd., Belgaum, Appellant
Versus
Belgaum Borough Municipality, Belgaum, Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 431 of 1961.
Advocates appeared
Mr. M. C. Setalvad, Attorney General for India (M/s. D. N. Mukherjee and B. N. Ghosh, Advocates, with him), for Appellant; Mr. A. V. Viswanatha Sastri, Sr. Advocate (Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, Advocate, with him), for Respondent.
OCTROI - BOMBAY MUNICIPAL BOROUGHS ACT, 1925 - SECTION 73(1)(IV) - LEVY OF OCTROI ON GOODS BROUGHT WITHIN OCTROI LIMITS FOR CONSUMPTION, USE OR SALE - MEANING OF CONSUMPTION OR USE - WHETHER SALE OF GOODS WITHIN OCTROI LIMITS IS LIABLE TO OCTROI - WHETHER PROCEDURE UNDER SECTIONS 75, 76 AND 77 NECESSARY FOR IMPOSITION OF OCTROI ON GOODS SOLD WITHIN OCTROI LIMITS.
Fact of the Case:
The Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Company of India Ltd. (the Company) brought petrol and other petroleum products inside the octroi limits of Belgaum Municipality for use, consumption, or sale. The Company claimed that it was not liable to pay octroi on categories other than the first. The Municipality agreed to give a refund according to rules in respect of the fourth category, i.e., goods sent by the Company from its Depot inside the octroi limits to extra municipal points where they were bought and consumed by persons other than the Company.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the tax was payable only when the goods or animals were brought for consumption or use, by the person who brought them in, but not when the goods or animals were brought in and sold and were consumed or used by the purchaser or someone else. However, the Court also held that the amendment of the Boroughs Act in 1954 to include the word "sale" in the description of "octroi" did not make any addition to the true concept of "octroi" as explained above. That concept included the bringing in of goods in a local area so that the goods come to a repose there.
Issues: 1. Whether the Company was liable to pay octroi on goods brought into the local area for consumption, use, or sale. 2. Whether the procedure under Sections 75, 76, and 77 was necessary for the imposition of octroi on goods sold within the octroi limits.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the Company was liable to pay octroi tax on goods brought into the local area (a) to be consumed by itself or sold by it to consumers directly and (b) for sale to dealers who in their turn sold the goods to consumers within the municipal area irrespective of whether such consumers bought them for use in the area or outside it. 2. The Court held that it was not necessary for the Municipality to follow the procedure for imposing taxes when the section was amended. The tax still remained the same. Its nature, incidence, or rates were not altered.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed with costs.
Judgment
HIDAYATULLAH, J.: In this appeal by certificate under Art. 133 (1) (b) of the Constitution granted by the High Court of Mysore against its judgment and order dated May 31, 1960, the Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Company of India Ltd., is the appellant and the Belgaum Borough Municipality, Belgaum, the respondent. The appeal arises out of proceedings commenced by the Company against the Municipality under Art. 226 of the Constitution for a writ or writs to prohibit the Municipality from charging octroi from the Company on its products brought inside the octroi limits for sale. The petition of the company was dismissed by the High Court. The Company deals in petrol and other petroleum products which it manufactures in its refineries situated outside the octroi limits of Belgaum Municipality. It brings these products inside the said area either for use or consumption by itself or for sale generally to its dealers and licenses who in their turn sell them to others. The Company also directly sells its products to Government both Civil and Military, and to local bodies and big private concerns. The Company has a divisional office and Depot in Belgaum and the petition in the High Court was filed by the Divisional Manager in-charge of that area. The Company in the normal course of its business operations appoints dealers and licensees and typical forms of agreement between the Company and such dealers and licensees have been exhibited in the case. According to the Company, the goods brought by it within the octroi limits can be divided into four separate categories as follows:
1. Goods consumed by the Company,
2. Goods sold by the Company through its dealers or by itself and consumed within the octroi limits by persons other than the Company,
3. Goods sold by the Company through its dealers or by itself inside the octroi limits to other persons but consumed by them outside the octroi limits; and
4.Goods sent by the company from its Depot inside the octroi limits to extra municipal points where they are bought and consumed by persons other than the company.
2. We are concerned in this appeal with a period of three years commencing on October 22, 1955, and ending on a like date in 1958. During this time, octroi duty levied on all goods brought inside the octroi limits of the municipality, irrespective of their destination according to the four categories above enumerated, amounted to Rs. 1,40,544.51 nP. The Company claimed in the High Court that it was not liable to pay octroi on categories other than the first. This claim was rejected but the Municipality agreed to give a refund according to rules in respect of the fourth category.
3. Before dealing with the contentions in the case it is necessary to refer briefly to the scheme of taxation under the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925, by which the Belgaum Municipality is governed and the bylaws and rules made by the municipality for the levy of octroi within the octroi limits of the Municipality. The Municipality draws its power to levy taxes from S. 73. That section provides inter alia as follows:
"(1) Subject to any general or special orders which the State Government may make in this behalf and to the provisions of Ss. 75 and 76, a municipality may impose for the purposes of this Act any of the following taxes, namely :
x x x x x
(iv) an octroi on animals or goods or both, brought within the octroi limits for consumption, use or sale therein;"
4. The words "use or sale" were substituted for the words "or use" from May 5, 1954, by an Amending Act of 1954 (Bombay Act 35 of 1954). In other words, before 1954 the word "sale" did not figure in the description of "octroi on animals or goods or both" which the Municipality was authorised to impose.
5. Sections 75 and 76 lay down the procedure which the Municipality must follow before imposing a tax. It is not necessary to quote the sections. It is sufficient to say that the Municipality passes a resolution at a general meeting, s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.