SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 219

T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, J.R.MUDHOLKAR, K.C.DAS GUPTA
Padma Vithoba Chakkayya – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Multani – Respondent


Advocates:
A.RANGANADHAM CHETTY, A.V.RANGAM, Gopal Singh, P.C.AGRAWAL, R.S.NARULA, V.Vedavalli

Judgment:

VENKATARAMA AYYAR, J.: This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment of the High Court of Hyderabad whereby it affirmed the judgment of the Court of the Additional District Judge of Adilabad dismissing the suit of the appellant. The facts are that there was a joint family consisting of one Chakkayya and his younger brother Rajanna. Chakkayya died in year 1923 leaving behind the appellant his son who it is said was at that time a minor a few months old. On December 21, 1923, Rama Rao the second defendant, sold the lands which are the subject-matter of the suit to Rajanna. It appears that as there was some difficulty in Rajanna getting possession of the properties, which were stated to have been usufructuarily mortgaged to the first defendant, the transaction of sale was cancelled and the same was endorsed on the sale deed. Thereafter the second defendant executed a fresh sale deed in favour of the first defendant and the latter has ever since continued in possession. The appellant filed the present suit on February 14, 1943 for recovery of possession of these properties from the first defendant was in management of the properties belonging to the joint family of C














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top