SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 71

S.R.DASS, M.HIDAYATULLAH, J.C.SHAH
Soorajmull Nagarmull – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax, (Central) , Calcutta – Respondent


Judgment

SHAH, J. : The assessees and the Commissioner have preferred appeals against the order of the Tribunal passed under S. 33(4) of the Indian Income-tax Act, after their applications to the High Court of Calcutta for orders requiring the Tribunal to state a case under S. 66(2) were dismissed.

2. Counsel for the assessees contends that even if his appeal against the order of the High Court under S. 66(2) fails on the merits, this Court has power to consider their appeal against the order of the Tribunal. This Court in Chandi Prasad Chhokhani v. State of Bihar. 1961-43 ITR-498 in dealing with cases where against the order passed by a Tax Tribunal, without appealing against the order of the High Court refusing to call for the statement of the case set out the practice as follows :

(a) Where the aggrieved party approaches the High Court under a taxing Statute for an order calling for a statement of the case and the High Court rejects the application, this Court in exercise of its powers under Art. 136 will not ordinarily allow the order of the High Court to be bypassed by entertaining an appeal directly against the order of the Tribunal. Such exercise of power would be particularly






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top