SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 372

A.K.SARKAR, J.L.KAPUR, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, S.R.DASS
Neptune Assurance Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Life Insurance Corporation Of India – Respondent


Judgment

SARKAR, J. : The appellant used to carry on both life and other kinds of insurance business. It was what is called in the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 a "composite insurer".

2. The respondent corporation was created by this Act on September 1,1956 and under S. 7 of the Act the terms of which we will have to set out later, all rights appertaining to the life insurance business of an insurer which in the Act is called the "controlled business", became vested in the respondent Corporation on the appointed day, that is, September 1, 1956. Under the orders of assessment to income-tax for the years 1955-56 and 1956 57, the appellant became entitled to certain refunds under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1922. The respondent Corporation claimed a part of those refunds under S. 7 and this claim was resisted by the appellant. This dispute was taken to the Life Insurance Tribunal for decision under the Act of 1956 and this Tribunal decided it in favour of the respondent Corporation. The present appeal is against the judgment of the Tribunal.

3. The provisions of the Income-tax Act under which the right to refund arose have to be briefly referred to before we proceed to c




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top