SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 131

J.L.KAPUR, K.C.DAS GUPTA, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
Cantonment Board, Ambala – Appellant
Versus
Dipak Parkash (Minor) – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, D.GUTPA, P.D.MENON

Judgment

DAS GUPTA, J. : In an appeal against the assessment of house tax of bungalow No. 127-B, Bank Road, Ambala Cantonment by the assessment committe of the Cantonment Board, Ambala, three questions arose as regards the liability of the assessee on which the Officer hearing the appeal entertained reasonable doubt and accordingly made a reference to the High Court of Punjab under S.84 (2) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 for the decision of these questions.

2. Admittedly half of this Bungalow had been appropriated under the provisions of the Cantonments (House Accommodation) Act No. VI of 1923 on a lease by the Central Government and was being used at the relevant time by some military officer for his residence. It was also admitted that the assessment list was signed originally by three of the four persons who formed the assessment committee and was signed by the fourth member a few days later. The appellate officer set out these circumstances in his statement and then formulated the three questions thus:

"1. Whether the occupation of the property by a Military Officer under the above circumstances amounts to user thereof for the public purpose.

2. Whether the occupation of the Military































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top