SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 84

J.C.SHAH, M.HIDAYATULLAH, S.R.DASS
K. Simrathmull – Appellant
Versus
Nanjallnginh Gowder – Respondent


Advocates:
BHAVANI LAL, G.GOPALAKRISHNAN, P.C.AGRAWAL, R.Ganapathy Iyer, R.THIAGARAJAN

Judgment

SHAH, J. : This is an appeal with special leave against the judgment of the High Court of Madras.

2. On February 18, 1948, S. Nanjalingiah Gowder - hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff -borrowed Rs. 1,500 from K. Simrathmull - hereinafter called the defendant. On February 19, 1948 the plaintiff executed a sale deed conveying to the defendant certain land at Ootacamund together with a house standing thereon and belonging to him for Rs. 700. Two other documents were executed on the same day: (1) a deed of reconveyance (Ext. A-1) counterpart of the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff which contained the following covenant:

"If you pay the sum of Rs. 1,500 within a period of two years I shall at your cost and your responsibility execute a sale in respect of the under-mentioned land and house. You shall pay the assessment for the house and the municipal tax, you shall if there is any arrears of rent pay the same prior to the sale, as per the rental deed executed by you and your father. If there is arrears of rent for six months, the aforesaid counterpart deed shall become cancelled.",

and (2) a Rent Note by the plaintiff and his father Bora Gowder in favour of the defendant ag







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top