SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(SC) 174

P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.C.DAS GUPTA, K.N.WANCHOO
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
N. Venugopal – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.R.CHARI, K.R.CHAUDHARY, N.N.KESHVANI, P.D.MENON

Judgment

DAS GUPTA, J.: The three respondents, Venugopal, Rangaswamy and Subbaiah were tried along with one Mittala Kamal Sab by the Session Judge, Anantapur Division, on a number of charges. Kamal Sab was acquitted of all the charges against him, but these three respondents were convicted of several offences. All three of them were convicted under Ss. 348, 331, and 201 read with S. 109 of the Indian Penal Code. Venugopal was further convicted under S. 343 of the Indian Penal Code. For the offence under S. 348 the respondents were sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years; for the offence under S. 331 of the Indian Penal Code each of them was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years; for the offence under S. 201 read with S. 109 of the Indian Penal Code they were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years each. Venugopal was sentenced to one year s rigorous imprisonment under S. 343 of the Indian Penal Code. All of them were acquitted of the charge under S. 302 read with S. 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The sentences imposed on them were directed to run concurrently. These orders of conviction and sentence were set aside by the High Court of Andhra Prad












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top