RAGHUBAR DAYAL, K.SUBBA RAO, J.C.SHAH, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.N.WANCHOO
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Mishrilal Tarachand Lodha – Respondent
Judgment
RAGHUBAR DAYAL J. : This appeal by special leave, raises the question whether the amount of interest decreed for the period subsequent to the institution of a suit comes within the expression amount or value of the subject matter in dispute in Art. 1 of Schedule I of the Bombay Court fees Act, 1959, hereinafter called the Act, for purposes of court-fee payable on the memorandum of appeal.
2. The plaintiff-respondent No. 1 instituted Special Suit No. 5 of 1957 in the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Ahmednagar to recover Rs. 13,205/- on account of the principal lent to defendant No. 7, and interest up to the date of the suit at the rate of 9 per cent per annum. On July 18, 1960, his claim was decreed in a sum of Rs. 13,033-6-6 with future interest from the date of suit till realisation at 4 per cent per annum on a sum of Rs. 10, 120/-.
3. Defendant No. 7 appealed to the High Court against the decree. In the memorandum of appeal, defendant No. 7 valued the claim for purpose of jurisdiction and court-fee at Rs. 13,033/6/6 and his grounds Nos. 1 and 48 of appeal were as follows:
"1. That the lower Court erred in decreeing the plaintiff s suit.
48. That the decree is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.