SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(SC) 291

J.L.KAPUR, J.R.MUDHOLKAR, K.SUBBA RAO, SYED JAFAR IMAM
Rai Sahib Ramdayal Ghasiram Oil Mills And Partnership Firm – Appellant
Versus
Labour Appellate Tribunal – Respondent


Advocates:
BISHAN NARAIN, K.L.Mehta

Judgment

MUDHOLKAR, J.: This is an appeal by a certificate from the summary dismissal by the Bombay High Court of a writ petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The relevant facts are these :

2. Rai Sahab Ramdayal Ghasiram Oil Mills (hereinafter referred to as the Mills) were closed on September 1, 1952 on the ground that they had sustained heavy losses. The closure was found to be bona fide and the workmen were awarded retrenchment benefit. The Mills, however, reopened on November 14, 1954, though their operations were carried on a reduced scale for avoiding further losses. Some of the retrenched workmen were re-employed by the Mills but evidently at lower wages than before. It was said on behalf of the Mills that all the former workmen could not be absorbed but it would appear that they had in fact employed some new hands as well. An industrial dispute having been raised by the respondent-union because of the non-absorption of 11 workmen, the State Government constituted an Industrial Tribunal consisting of Mr. Kurian, under S. 7 of the Industrial Dispute Act, as it stood on that date, on May 13, 1955 and referred the following dispute to him :

"Whether the retrenched













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top