SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(SC) 262

J.C.SHAH, A.K.SARKAR, M.HIDAYATULLAH
Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Indian Woollen Textiles Mills – Respondent


Judgment

SHAH, J.: M/s. Indian Woollen Textiles Mills Amritsar -hereinafter called the assessee -had branches at different places in India, one of which was an industrial undertaking conducted in the name of Eldee Velvet and Silk Mills-called for the sake of brevity "Eldee . "Eldee had advanced Rs. 3,21,460/- to another concern, the Bombay Fine Worsted Manufacturers Castle Mills-hereinafter called Castle . In the assessment year 1951-52, the assessee claimed under S. 15C of the Indian Income-tax Act 1922, exemption from tax in respect of 6 per cent of the capital employed in Eldee as a newly established undertaking and sought to include in the computation of the capital so employed Rs. 3,21,460/- advanced to Castle . The Income-tax Officer, Special Circle, Amritsar, and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejected the claim. But the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal modified the assessment and directed inclusion of the amount advanced to Castle in the computation of capital invested for the purpose of S. 15C. An application submitted under S 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act to the Tribunal to refer a question which it was contended by the Commissioner arose out of the ord







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top