SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(SC) 108

S.K.DAS, M.HIDAYATULLAH, A.K.SARKAR
C. B. Gosain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent


Judgment

SARKAR J.-The appellant had entered into a contract with a company called the Hindustan Steel Private Ltd., for the manufacture and supply of bricks at Rourkela in Orissa. Large quantities of bricks were manufactured and supplied under the contract and the appellant received payment for them The respondent State assessed the appellant to sales tax under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 on these supplies on the basis that they were sales. The appellant contended that the contract was only for labour or for work done and material found, and that there was really no sale of any goods on which the tax could be levied. He moved the High Court of Orissa for a write of mandamus directing the respondent State not to assess or levy the tax. The application was rejected in limine by the High Court. The appellant has now come to this Court in further appeal.

Now a sale which can be taxed under the Act has been defined as "Any transfer of property ingoods for cash or deferred payment or other valuable consideration." The point at issue is whether the contract was for a transfer of property in the bricks from the appellant to the Company for a consideration.

It is said that the bricks were









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top