SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(SC) 104

M.HIDAYATULLAH, N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Sabir Ali – Respondent


Advocates:
Atiqur Rehman, C.P.LAL, O.P.RANA

Judgment

HIDAYATULLAH, J. : This is an appeal by certificate granted by the High Court of Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) against its order dated March 12, 1962 quashing the trial of the respondents for an offence under S. 15(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Private Forests Act (VI of 1949). This trial commenced on February 11, 1959, on a complaint by the District Magistrate, Baharaich. The charge against the first respondent was that the sold one tamarind tree to respondent No. 2 for the purpose of feeling and removing it without obtaining permission from the competent authority and that against respondent No. 2 was that he felled the tree and removed it. The complaint was transferred from one Magistrate to another till it came on the file of Mr. T. B. Upadhaya who was a Magistrate of the Second Class. After Mr. Upadhaya had recorded all the evidence and examined the two respondents the powers of Magistrate, First class were conferred on him. Thereafter he pronounced judgment in the case and finding respondents guilty he sentenced them to pay a fine of Rs. 50/- each or to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. The respondents filed an appeal before the Additional Sessions Judge, Baharaich whi



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top