SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(SC) 119

S.M.SIKRI, J.C.SHAH, K.SUBBA RAO
J. Dalmia – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.MAHESHVARI, C.K.DAFTARY, K.N.RAJAGOPAL SASTRI, R.N.SACH, S.K.KAPOOR

Judgement

SHAH, J.: The appellant which is a Hindu undivided family was the registered holder of 1500 shares of M/s Govan Bros. (Rampur) Ltd. in the year of account October 1, 1950 to September 30, 1951. Pursuant to a resolution passed by the board of directors of M/s. Govan Bros. (Rampur) Ltd. - hereinafter called Govan Bros . - at a meeting held on August 30, 1950, the appellant received a dividend warrant dated December 28, 1950 for Rs. 4,12,500/- being interim dividend in respect of its shareholding in Govan Bros. This amount was brought to tax with the other income of the appellant in the assessment year 1952-53 by the Revenue authorities, after rejecting the objection of the appellant that it represented income for the assessment year 1951-52.

2. At the instance of the appellant the Appellate Tribunal drew up a statement of the case and referred the question set out herein below to the High Court of Punjab under S. 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act:

"Whether on a true interpretation of Article 95 of the First Schedule to the Indian Companies Act, 1913, the dividend of Rs. 4,12,500/- was liable to be included in the assessment year 1952-53."

The High Court recorded an answer to
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top