RAGHUBAR DAYAL, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.SUBBA RAO, K.N.WANCHOO, J.C.SHAH
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Kaushailiya: Rani: Champa: Kanta: Ramkali Alias Gita: Asha – Respondent
Judgment
SUBBA RAO, J. : These six appeals filed by certificates granted by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad raise the question of the vires of S. 20 of the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 (104 of 1956), hereinafter called the Act.
2. The relevant facts may be briefly stated. The respondents are alleged to be prostitute carrying on their trade in the City of Kanpur. On receiving information from the Sub-Inspector of Police, who is not a Special Police Officer, the City Magistrate, Kanpur, issued notices to the respondents under S. 20(1) of the Act to show cause why they should not be required to remove themselves from the places where they were residing and be prohibited from re-entering them. The respondents received the notices and filed objections claiming that the proceedings were not legally maintainable. The learned City Magistrate repelled the said objections. Against the orders of the Magistrate the respondents went up in revision to the Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur, but the same were dismissed. Thereafter the respondents preferred revisions to the High Court of judicature at Allahabad and the said High Court allowed the revision pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.