RAGHUBAR DAYAL, M.HIDAYATULLAH, K.SUBBA RAO, J.C.SHAH, J.R.MUDHOLKAR
A. Hajee Abdul Shukoor And Company – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madras – Respondent
Judgment
RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J. : These are three petitions under Art. 32 by the petitioners, which is a partnership firm, praying for a declaration that S. 2 of the Madras General Sales Tax (Special Provisions) Act 1963 (Act No. 11 of 1963) hereinafter called the Act, is ultra vires the Constitution and of no effect and for a writ of mandamus directing the State of Madras to refrain from enforcing any of the provisions of that section. Each of the petitions relates to a particular assessment year.
2. The petitioners are dealers in skin carrying on business at Shenbakkam, Vellore, North Arcot District, in the State of Madras. They purchase raw skins from places both within and outside the State of Madras, tan the same and sell them through their agents in Madras. They were assessed to a certain amount of sales-tax, in accordance with the provision of the Madras General Sales Tax Act 1939 (Madras Act IX 1939) and R. 16(2) (ii) of the rules framed thereunder viz. the Madras General Sales Tax (Turnover and Assessment) Rules, on the turnover of hides and skins purchased in the untanned condition outside the State, but tanned within the State, with respect to each of the assessment years 1955
referred : State of Travancore-Cochin v. Shanmugha Vilas Cashewnut factory
Firm A.T.B. Mehtab Majid and Co. v. State of Madras
Govt. of Andhra v. Nagendrappa
State of Andhra Pradesh v. Mohammad Azam Abdul Bari and Co.
Abdul Subban and Co. v. State of Madras
Raghbir Chand som Chand v. Excise and Taxation Ufficer, Bhatinda
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.