SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(SC) 68

K.SUBBA RAO, K.C.DAS GUPTA, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
Sunil Kumar Paul – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


Advocates:
D.N.MUKHERJI, P.K.BOSH, P.K.CHAKRAVARTI

Judgment

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J. :

Sunil Kumar Paul has preferred this appeal, after obtaining a certificate from the Calcutta High Court under Art. 134 (1) (c) of the Constitution. The facts leading to the appeal are these.

2. The appellant was a clerk in the office of the Sub-Divisional Health Officer at Barrackpore in 1955-56. He used to prepare bills of the establishment, to present them at the Sub-treasury and later present them at the State Bank at Barrackpore, to receive payment in cash and to make over that amount to the Sub-Divisional Health Officer. Certain bills were drawn under the heading 38-Medical . Certain bills were to be drawn under the heading 39-Public Health . Some other bills were drawn under other headings.

3. On October 5, 1956, the appellant presented a bill for Rs. 1769/- out of which a sum of Rs. 5-10-0 was to be credited in the Postal Life Insurance Ledger and the balance of Rs. 1763-6-0 was to be received in cash. This bill was duly passed by the Sub-treasury and was subsequently presented to the Bank on October 6, 1956 for payment of Rs. 1763-6-0. The Bank paid this amount to the appellant. The amount was not paid to the Sub-Divisional Health Officer. In fac



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top