SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(SC) 263

S.M.SIKRI, K.SUBBA RAO, J.C.SHAH
Jaipuria Brothers LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
G.S.PATHAK, K.SRINIVASAN INDRAJEETH SHAH, O.P.RANA, R.GOPAL KRISHNAN, S.P.Varma

Judgment

SHAH, J.: The appellant- a public limited Company having its registered office at Calcutta, was with effect from October 5, 1946, appointed sole agent for sale of goods manufactured by the Swadeshi Cotton Mills Company Ltd. On March 20, 1952, the Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur, issued a notice under S. 21 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 calling upon the appellant Company to file a return of its turnover for the assessment year 1948-49 on the ground that the turnover had escaped assessment. On March 31, 1952, the Sales Tax Officer made a "best judgment" assessment and determined the taxable turnover of the appellant Company at Rs. 50 lakhs for the year 1948-49 and determined the appropriate tax liability.

2. In appeal to the Judge (Appeals) Sales Tax the order passed by the Sales Tax Officer was set aside, that authority holding that the appellant Company was not a dealer within the meaning of S. 2 (c) of the Act. But the order of the appellate authority was set aside by the Judge (Revisions) Sales Tax by order dated March 28, 1955 and the case was remanded to the Sales Tax Officer for "fresh assessment". In the view of the Judge (Revisions) Sales Tax it was necessary to determin




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top