SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(SC) 18

R.S.BACHAWAT, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, V.RAMASWAMI
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Shree Ram Bohra – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.VISHWANATHA SASTRI, B.B.G.K.Achar, BISHAN NARAIN, D.B.PREM, K.K.SINHA, R.N.SACH

Judgment

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J. : Bilas Rai Bohra, son of Bansidhar Bohra and Shri Ram Bohra, son of Ganpat Ram Bohra, sued the Union of India for the recovery of Rs. 13,448 from the defendant for compensation on account of loss and damage suffered by the plaintiffs owing to non-delivery of 11 bales of cloth which had been consigned on October 20, 1948 by M/s. Ram Kishun Das Sagarmal of Bombay to the plaintiffs under the description of M/s. Banshidhar Ganpat Rai. It was alleged in para 1 of the plaint that the plaintiffs carried on business in cloth and other articles in the name and style of M/s. Bansidhar Ganpat Rai which was their joint family trading firm governed by the Mitakshara School of Hindu Law of which joint family the plaintiffs were the kartas and representatives and that they sued as such. This statement in para 1 of the plaint was not admitted in the written statement. The trial Court decreed the suit on August 29, 1951. The decree, inter alia, said :

"It is ordered that the suit be decreed with costs (and?) defendants do pay to the plaintiffs the sum of Rs. 13,448 with interest thereon...."

2. The Union of India appealed to the High Court of Patna and prayed for the setti
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top