M.HIDAYATULLAH, N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Jalil – Respondent
Judgment
AYYANGAR, J. :
The respondents in these several appeals were prosecuted before Magistrates in Tripura for offences under S. 26 (1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and were convicted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment and fine. Their appeals to the learned Sessions Judge, Tripura having been dismissed, they preferred Criminal Revision petition to the Judicial Commissioner; the learned Judicial Commissioner allowed their revisions by a common judgment and directed their acquittal. From these orders of acquittal the Union of India has filed these appeals by virtue of special leave granted by this Court under Art, 136 of the Constitution.
2. Before proceeding to narrate the facts which have led to these appeals it is necessary to mention that three of these 11 appeals Criminal Appeals 40, 41 and 45 of 1962 have become infructuous. The notices issued to the respondents in Appeals 40 and 45 of 1962 of the filings of the appeals could not be served on them as it was reported that they had left for Pakistan. The appeals, could not accordingly be prosecuted. In regard to Criminal Appeal 41 of 1962 it is reported that the accused died pending the hearing of the appeal and hence the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.