1. Hire-purchase agreements for motor vehicles — Levy of sales tax under the Madras General Sales Tax Act — Challenge to the definition of sale. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 )
Back
Next 
1964 Supreme(SC) 306
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
10th November 1964.
P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J.I., K.N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, RAGHUBAR DAYAL AND J.R. MUDHOLKAR, JJ.
M/s. K. L. Johar and Co., (In both the Appeals), Appellants
Versus
The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Coimbatore III (In both the Appeals), Respondent.
The Attorney-General for India and the Advocates-General for the States of Andhra Pradesh, Assam Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Madras, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh, Interveners.
Civil Appeals Nos. 245 and 246 of 1963.
Advocates appeared
Mr. A. V. Viswanatha Sastri, Senior Advocate, (M/s. B.R.L. lyengar, B. D. Dhawan, S. K. Mehta and K. L. Mehta, Advocates with him), for Appellants, (In both the Appeals); Mr. A. Ranganadham Chetty, Senior Advocate (M/s. V. Ramaswamy and A. V. Rangam, with him), for Respondent (In both the Appeals); Mr. S.V. Gupte, Solicitor-General of India, (Mr. B. R.G. K. Achar, Advocate with him), for Intervener No. 1 Mr. B. V. Subramaniam, Advocate General for the State of Andhra Pradesh, (Mr. B.R.G.K. Achar, Advocate with him), for Intervener No. 2 Mr. Naunit Lal Advocate, for Intervener No. 3, Mr. V. P. Gopalan Nambiar, Advocate-General, for the State of Kerala, (Dr. V. A. Seyid Muhammad, Advocate with him), for Intervenet No. 4. Mr. M. Adhikari, Advocate-General for, the State of Madhya Pradesh, (Mr. I. N. Shroff Advocate, with him), for Intervener No. 5. Mr. R. N. Sachthey, Advocate for Intervener No. 7. Mr. C. B. Agarwala, Senior Advocate, (Mr. O. P. Rana, Advocate with him), for Intervener No. 8.
A hire-purchase agreement is a bailment that becomes a sale only when the option to purchase is exercised. State legislatures cannot deem such agreements as sales from the outset, as this exceeds their constitutional competence to tax "sale of goods."
Headnote:(A) State Sales Tax Act - Section 2(h), Explanation 1 - Constitution of India - Entry 54, List II - Sale of Goods Act - Hire-purchase agreements - Nature of transaction - A hire-purchase agreement consists of two elements: bailment and an eventual sale. The element of sale fructifies only when the option to purchase is exercised by the intending purchaser after fulfilling the terms of the agreement. (Paras 11, 17)
(B) Legislative Competence - The State legislature cannot expand the meaning of "sale of goods" beyond its recognized legal import in the Sale of Goods Act. A provision deeming a hire-purchase agreement as a sale from the date of the agreement, notwithstanding the fact that the property does not pass to the purchaser at that time, is beyond the legislative competence of the State and is invalid. (Paras 14-16)
(C) Quantum of Sale Price - In a hire-purchase transaction, the sale price for taxation is neither the nominal amount paid for the option nor the total sum of installments paid. The taxable value is the value of the goods at the time the option is exercised, which should be determined by the tax authorities considering depreciation and other relevant factors. (Paras 18-22)
Facts of the case:
A financing company entered into hire-purchase agreements for motor vehicles. The company paid the full price to the dealer, and the hirer paid installments to the company. The agreements provided that upon payment of all installments, the hirer could purchase the vehicle for a nominal sum of Re. 1. The tax authorities assessed sales tax on these transactions, treating them as sales from the date the agreements were entered into, based on a statutory deeming provision.
Findings of Court:
The transaction involves two distinct sales: first, from the dealer to the financier, and second, from the financier to the hirer. The statutory provision deeming a hire-purchase agreement as a sale immediately upon execution is ultra vires. Tax is only exigible when the option to purchase is exercised and the sale actually takes place. The taxable price is the depreciated value of the vehicle at the time of the second sale.
Issues: Whether a hire-purchase agreement constitutes a sale at the time of execution; whether the State legislature is competent to deem such agreements as sales; and how the sale price should be determined for taxation purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: The power to tax "sale of goods" is limited to transactions where property passes from the seller to the buyer. In a hire-purchase agreement, property remains with the owner until the option is exercised. Therefore, any legislation that deems a transaction a sale when property does not pass is beyond the legislative competence of the State.
Result: Appeals partly allowed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Validity of deeming hire-purchase as sale — Legislative competence of State to expand the meaning of sale beyond the Indian Sale of Goods Act. (Para 5 )
3. Distinction between sale and hire-purchase — Analysis of legislative competence under Entry 54, List II — Determination of taxable event and sale price. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 )
4. State legislature cannot deem hire-purchase agreements as sales before the option to purchase is exercised; taxable event occurs only when property actually passes. (Para 16 , 17 )
5. Appeals partly allowed — Assessments set aside — Direction to determine sale price based on vehicle value at the time the option is exercised. (Para 23 )
6. Are hire-purchase agreements considered sales at the time the agreement is entered into?
No. A hire-purchase agreement contains elements of both bailment and sale. The sale only fructifies when the hirer exercises the option to purchase after fulfilling all terms. Until that point, the property remains with the owner, and the transaction is essentially a bailment. (Para 11 , 17 )
7. Can a State legislature expand the definition of sale to include hire-purchase agreements via a deeming fiction?
No. Under Entry 54, List II of the Constitution, the State can only tax sales within the meaning of the Sale of Goods Act. Deeming a hire-purchase agreement a sale before property passes is beyond the legislative competence of the State. (Para 15 , 16 )
8. When is sales tax exigible in a hire-purchase transaction?
Sales tax is exigible only when the taxable event—the actual sale—occurs. This happens when the hirer exercises the option to purchase and all terms of the hire-purchase agreement are fulfilled, resulting in the transfer of property. (Para 17 )
9. How is the sale price determined for tax purposes when a hire-purchase option is exercised?
The price is neither the nominal option fee nor the total hire payments. It is the value of the vehicle at the time the option is exercised, which the authorities must determine by considering depreciation and other relevant factors. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 )
Judgment
WANCHOO, J.:
These two appeals on certificates granted by the Madras High Court raise common questions and will be dealt with together. The appellant is a financing company consisting of a number of partners. Its main business is to advance money to persons who purchase motor vehicles but are themselves not in a position to find ready money to pay the price. The course of business followed by the appellant is to enter into hire-purchase agreements with those who want to purchase motor vehicles. It is necessary to refer to the terms of hire-purchase agreements which are on a set pattern in order to understand the points raised in these appeals.
2. Any person desirous of acquiring a motor vehicle makes the selection of the make and type and fixes the price therefor with the motor dealer. Such person then approaches the appellant for financial assistance on a hire-purchase basis. Sometimes an initial payment is made to the motor dealer which is taken into account at the time of the hire-purchase agreement while at others the payment is made in a number of instalments to the appellant. In either case the appellant pays the price or the balance thereof to the dealer and thereafter the hire-purchase agreement is entered into between the appellant and the person who wants to purchase the motor vehicle. The appellant is described in the agreement as the owner of the vehicle and the person who wants to purchase it as the hirer.
3. The material terms of the agreement may be summarised here. The agreement provides that the owner (namely, the appellant) will let and the hirer (namely, the person who wants to purchase the vehicle) will take on hire the vehicle in question for such period as may be fixed in each case (cl. 1). The hirer has to pay a certain amount per month to the owner and where an initial deposit is made this amount is larger for the first month and other monthly payments are smaller. The hirer has to pay during the period of hire the montly instalment, the vehicle is registered in the name of the owner and the hirer is forbidden to represent himself as the owner thereof or to do anything to suggest that he is the owner thereof; the hirer has to keep the vehicle in good and serviceable repair, order and condition to the satisfaction of the owner, and he is also to insure and keep insured the vehicle against loss or damage by fire, accident and third party risks and punctually pay premia and all moneys payable in respect of such insurance : (see cl. 3). The hirer has further to pay all taxes, licence fees, duties, fines, registration charges and other charges payable in respect of the vehicle and all rents and out goings payable by the hirer in respect of the premises where the vehicle is kept or garaged when the same respectively becomes due : (see cl. 3 (e)). He has also to satisfy the owner about all the above things having been duly done. He cannot sell, charge, pledge, assign or part with possession of the vehicle (cl. 3(g)). The hirer has also to make good all damages to the vehicle, (fair wear and tear excepted) and pay the owner the full value of the vehicle in the event of total loss, whether the damage or loss be caused accidentally or otherwise and to keep the vehicle at the sole risk of the hirer until the hirer purchases the vehicle or returns it to the owner : (cl. 5). If the hirer makes default in the payment of any rent for seven days, the hiring immediately determines and the owner may without notice retake possession of the vehicle, and it shall be at the option of the owner to reinstate the contract on such conditions as it deems fit after the determination of the hiring as aforesaid : (cl. 14). Upon the determination of the hiring as above, all arrears of rents up to the date of determination and all costs and expenses incurred by the owner in the exercise of the powers conferred by the agreement shall be paid by the hirer, and the hirer-shall not be entitled to any repayment of any sum previously p
