SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(SC) 328

J.C.SHAH, M.HIDAYATULLAH, R.S.BACHAWAT
Jashwantrai Malukchand. – Appellant
Versus
Anandilal Bapalal – Respondent


Advocates:
GANPAT RAI, J.B.DADACHAN, O.C.MATHUR, Ravindra Narayan, S.T.DESAI

Judgment

HIDAYATULLAH, J. : Jashwantrai Malukchand who appeals by special leave against the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat dated October 21, 1961 was a tenant of a shop belonging to Anandilal Bapalal respondent, by the judgment now under appeal the High Court reversed the concurrent decision of the two Courts below and ordered eviction of the appellant from the shop on the ground that he was in arrears for a period of six months in the payment of the rent. By a supplementary order dated January 16, 1962 mesne profits were also granted to the landlord till delivery of possession of the shop. The High Court has differed from the two Courts below in the application of the third sub-section of S.12 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, by which sub-section the present proceedings were governed. The High Court held that cl. (a) of the sub-section applied while the Courts below applied cl. (b). Before we read the section the facts necessary to understand this difference in the two points of view may be stated.

2. The tenant rented the shop from April 1, 1954 and executed a rent note for Rs. 155 p.m. From February 1, 1955 he did not pay the rent and wh














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top