SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(SC) 245

State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
K. M. Charia Abdulla And Company – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.VISHWANATHA SASTRI, R.GOPAL KRISHNAN, V.A.SEYID MUHAMMAD, V.P.G.NAMBIAR

Judgment

SUBBA RAO, J. : I regret my inability to agree. The facts are fully stated in the judgment of my learned brother Shah, J. It would, therefore, be enough if only the relevant facts were stated. The Respondents are dealers in pepper and other condiments. For the year 1950-51 they submitted their return under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, wherein they claimed exemption in respect of certain transactions on the ground that they were commission sales exempted under S. 8 of the said Act. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Cannanore (Rural) gave the exemption claimed and assessed the tax on the turnover relating to transactions other than those exempted. The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Coimbatore Division, called for the record of the case of the respondents for the said assessment year, and in exercise of the powers under S. 12 (2)(i) of the Act directed a fresh enquiry in respect of the said exemption. He issued a notice on February 9, 1956, calling upon the respondents to show cause against the proposed revision of assessment. On the basis of fresh evidence, the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes came to the conclusion that the respondents did not ac





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top