SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(SC) 67

K.SUBBA RAO, R.S.BACHAWAT, J.C.SHAH
Sarju Prasad Saha – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.RANGANADHAM CHETTY, A.V.RANGAM, Atiqur Rehman, C.B.AGARWAL, C.P.LAL, O.P.RANA, P.C.AGRAWAL, S.P.SINHA

Judgment

SHAH, J. : On June 28, 1955 the State of U. P. notified under S. 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1 of 1894 that plots Nos.1708, 1709 and 1710 admeasuring in the aggregate 3.21 acres situate at Mohalla Nai Bazar in the town of Basti were likely to be needed for a public purpose i.e., for waterworks supply scheme for the Basti Municipality". The appellant filed under S. 5-A of the Act objections against the intended acquisition. The Land Acquisition Officer held an enquiry and submitted a report to the Government recommending that the land be exempted from acquisition. On March 7, 1956 the proceedings for acquisition were abandoned by the Government of U. P. On November 10, 1960, a fresh notification was issued under S. 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act by the Government of U. P. intimating that an area out of plots Nos. 1708, 1709 and 1710 admeasuring 1.13 acres was likely to be needed for a public purpose, viz., water-works scheme for the Basti Municipality. Simultaneously therewith the Government of U.P. in purported exercise of powers under S. 17 (4) of the Act directed that the provisions of S. 5-A of the Act shall not apply to the land notified. Later the Government o




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top