SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. SUBBA RAO, J.C. SHAH AND S.M. SIKRI, JJ.
The Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad (In all the Appeals), Appellant
Versus
The Cocanada Radhaswami Bank Ltd., Kakinada (In all the Appeals), Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 155 to 157 of 1964.
Advocates appeared
Mr. S. V. Gupte, Solicitor General of India, (M/s. N. D. Karkhanis and R. N. Sachthey, Advocates, with him), for Appellant (In all Appeals); Mr. G. S. Pathak, Senior Advocate (M/s. B. Datta and T. Satyanarayana, Advocates, with him), for Respondent (In all the appeals).
INCOME TAX - Set off of losses - Business loss - Whether can be set off against income from securities - S. 24(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Fact of the Case:
The assessee, a private limited company carrying on banking business, sustained a loss in its banking activities for the assessment year 1949-50. The assessee also had income from interest on securities. The question arose whether the business loss could be set off against the income from securities under S. 24(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the business loss could be set off against the income from securities. The Court found that the securities formed part of the assessee's trading assets and the income therefrom was, therefore, the income of the business. The Court further held that S. 24(2) of the Act was enacted to give further relief to an assessee carrying on a business and incurring loss in the business though the income therefrom falls under different heads under S. 6 of the Act.
Issues: Whether the business loss could be set off against the income from securities under S. 24(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the business loss could be set off against the income from securities because: * The securities formed part of the assessee's trading assets and the income therefrom was, therefore, the income of the business. * S. 24(2) of the Act was enacted to give further relief to an assessee carrying on a business and incurring loss in the business though the income therefrom falls under different heads under S. 6 of the Act.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the appeals and held that the High Court was right in answering the question referred to it in the affirmative.
Judgement
SUBBA RAO, J.: These appeals by special leave raise the question of construction of Section 24 (2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, hereinafter called the Act.
2. The material facts may briefly be stated. The Cocanada Bank Ltd., Kakinada, hereinafter called the assessee, is a private limited company carrying on banking business with its head office at Kakinada and a branch at Dayal Bagh. The assessee s sources of income are banking business and interest from Government securities. For the assessment year 1949-50 its income was assessed as follows: 48
Interest on securities Rs. 84,880
Other banking activities Rs. 64,400 (loss)
Net loss Rs. 55,912
The following tabular form shows at a glance the factual position in regard to the income of the assessee under different heads during the said three years.
Year of assessment Interest on securities Business income or loss (as finally decided by the A.A.C.) Total
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Rs. Rs. Rs.
1. 1950-51 5,191 886 6,077
2. 1951-52 2,174 1,177 3,351
3. 1952-53 1,885 9,121 11,006
For the three succeeding years the department showed the income under the said two separate heads but allowed the said loss to be set off against the income under the head "business" and disallowed it against the income under the head "interest on securities". The view of the Income-tax Officer was confirmed, on appeal, by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and, on further appeal, by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The following question was referred by the Tribunal to the High Court for its opinion:
"Whether on the facts and in circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled to set off the business loss of Rs.55,912 brought forward from the preceding year against the entire income including interest on securities held by the assessee".
The High Court, having regard to the decision of this Court in United Commercial Bank Ltd. v. Commr. of Income-tax, West Bengal, 1958 SCR 79, remitted the case to the Income-tax Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, for making a fuller statement of case on the question whether these securities in question formed part of the trading assets held by the assessee in the course of its business as a bank and whether its dealing with the securities from which it received interest was as much the assessee s business as receiving deposits from clients and withdrawals by them. The Income-tax Tribunal, on a further hearing, held that the receipt of interest from securities was as much the assessee s business as its other banking activities like receiving deposits from the clients and withdrawals by them. On receipt of the supplementary statement of case from the Tribunal the High Court answered the reference in favour of the assessee. Hence the present appeals.
3. Learned counsel for the Revenue argued that the income from business and securities fell under different heads, namely, S. 10 and S. 8 of the Act respectively, that they were mutually exclusive and, therefore, the losses under the head "business" could not be carried forward from the preceding year to the succeeding year and set off under S. 22 (4) of the Act against the income from securities held by the assessee.
4. Learned counsel for the assessee, on the other hand, contended that though for the purpose of computation of income, the income from securities and the income from business were calculated separately, in a case where the securities were part of the trading assets of the business, the income therefrom was part of the income of the business and, therefore, the losses incurred under the head "business" could be set off during the succeeding years against the total income of the business, i.e., income from the business including due income from the securities.
5. The relevant section of the Act which deals with the matter of set off of losses in computing the aggregate income in S. 24. The relevant part of it, before the Finance Act, 1955, read:
"(1) Where any assessee sustains a loss of profits or gains in any year unde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.