M.HIDAYATULLAH, K.SUBBA RAO, J.R.MUDHOLKAR, A.K.SARKAR
Mahadev Sharma Tunuk Lal Mondal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
Judgement
HIDAYATULLAH, J.: In these two appeals by nine persons, who have been convicted under S. 302/149, Indian Penal Code, special leave is limited to one question of law, namely, whether the accused could be legally convicted under the above sections when they were not charged and convicted under S. 147 or S. 148 of the Indian Penal Code? It appears from the judgment under appeal that there was a difference of opinion on this point in the High Court at Patna and the appeals in the High Court were disposed of by a Full Bench which held that charges under Ss. 147 and 148 were not necessary before conviction under S. 302, Indian Penal Code could be made with the aid of S. 149, Indian Penal Code.
2. In view of the limited nature of the appeals only the essential facts may be stated. The person who lost his life was one Misari who was related to some of the accused persons. In the past there were other incidents. In 1955 one Ajablal was murdered and some of the present accused were prosecuted but were acquitted. Subsequently, one Baldeo Sharma was murdered and some of the prosecution witnesses in this case were charged with that offence. At the time of the judgment under appeal (Augu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.