SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(SC) 116

K.C.DAS GUPTA, K.SUBBA RAO, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
K. Narasimhiah – Appellant
Versus
H. C. Singri Gowda – Respondent


Advocates:
GIRISH CHANDRA, N.S.KRISHNA RAO, R.GOPAL KRISHNAN, S.K.VENKATARANGA IYENGAR

Judgement

DAS GUPTA, J.: Is the requirement of three clear days notice for the holding of a special general meeting as embodied in S. 27(3) of the Mysore Town Municipalities Act 1951, a mandatory provision? That is the main question which arises for decision in this appeal.

2. The appellant was elected as the President of Holenarsipur Municipality on September 11, 1962. At a special general meeting of the Municipal Council held on October 14, 1963, a resolution was passed in the following terms:-

"This Council has no confidence in the Municipal President of Holenarsipur Municipality."

3. On November 2, 1963 Mr. Narasimhiah, the President of the Council applied to the High Court of Mysore under Art. 226 of the Constitution praying for the issue of an appropriate writ quashing the proceedings of the meeting which culminated in the resolution of no confidence against him. Prayers were made also for some consequential reliefs.

4. Holenarsipur Municipality has twenty Councillors. Thirteen out of them sent a request to the President to convene a special general meeting to discuss a resolution expressing no confidence in him as President. This request was handed over to the President on 25th S
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top