SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(SC) 167

V.RAMASWAMI, A.K.SARKAR, M.HIDAYATULLAH
Matukdhari Singh – Appellant
Versus
Janardan Prasad – Respondent


Advocates:
D.GOVERDHAN CHARY, D.P.Singh, R.K.GARG, RAMAMURTHI, S.C.AGRAWAL

Judgement

HIDAYATULLAH, J. : By an order pronounced on May 7, 1965, we ordered the dismissal of this appeal but reserved our reasons which we now proceed to give.

2. The five appellants were tried on a complaint by the respondent Janardan Prasad before the Honorary Magistrate, First Class, Jehanabad for offence under Ss. 420, 468, 406, 465/471, Indian Penal Code. They were acquitted on August 31, 1962. The complainant obtained special leave of the High Court at Patna under S. 417(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and filed an appeal against their acquittal. The High Court set aside the acquittal and remanded the case to District Magistrate of Gaya with a direction that the case be inquired into under Chapter XVIII of the Code from the stage of taking evidence under S. 208, with a view to their committal to the Court of Session. The appellants now appeal by special leave against the judgment and order of the High Court. The facts of the prosecution case may now be stated briefly.

3. Janardhan Prasad and his brother Jangal Prasad were separate, having prior to the present occurrence, partitioned their lands by metes and bounds. Plot Nos. 1810 and 1811 in village Kalpa Kalan fell to t











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top