V.RAMASWAMI, A.K.SARKAR, M.HIDAYATULLAH
Matukdhari Singh – Appellant
Versus
Janardan Prasad – Respondent
Judgement
HIDAYATULLAH, J. : By an order pronounced on May 7, 1965, we ordered the dismissal of this appeal but reserved our reasons which we now proceed to give.
2. The five appellants were tried on a complaint by the respondent Janardan Prasad before the Honorary Magistrate, First Class, Jehanabad for offence under Ss. 420, 468, 406, 465/471, Indian Penal Code. They were acquitted on August 31, 1962. The complainant obtained special leave of the High Court at Patna under S. 417(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and filed an appeal against their acquittal. The High Court set aside the acquittal and remanded the case to District Magistrate of Gaya with a direction that the case be inquired into under Chapter XVIII of the Code from the stage of taking evidence under S. 208, with a view to their committal to the Court of Session. The appellants now appeal by special leave against the judgment and order of the High Court. The facts of the prosecution case may now be stated briefly.
3. Janardhan Prasad and his brother Jangal Prasad were separate, having prior to the present occurrence, partitioned their lands by metes and bounds. Plot Nos. 1810 and 1811 in village Kalpa Kalan fell to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.