SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(SC) 329

J.R.MUDHOLKAR, R.S.BACHAWAT, A.K.SARKAR
Jagat Bahadur – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
E.C.AGARWAL, I.M.SHROFF, M.N.SHROFF, P.C.AGRAWAL

Judgement

MUDHOLKAR, J. : The appellant, a police constable, was tried for an offence under Ss 170, 342 and 392, Indian Penal Code but was acquitted by the trying Magistrate of all these offences. The High Court to which an appeal was preferred by the State Government set aside the acquittal and convicted the appellant of each of these offences. It sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year in respect of the offence under S. 170 and to a period of six months for an offence under S. 342. In respect of the offence under S. 392 the High Court sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and further ordered that all the sentences should run concurrently.

2. Briefly stated the prosecution case was that the appellant who was posted at Rewa took leave for 15 days from August 7, 1958 with a view to go to his village Hati in District Satna but instead went to Jabalpur wearing the uniform of a police head constable. There he met the complainant Ram Kumar , P. W. 1 at the Omti Bridge near the pan shop of one Saligram P. W. 2. He engaged him in conversation and learnt from him that the latter was from village Beldara, police station Maihar. He to










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top