SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(SC) 251

J.R.MUDHOLKAR, R.S.BACHAWAT, K.SUBBA RAO
R. Jeevaratnam – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madras – Respondent


Advocates:
A.RANGANADHAM CHETTY, A.V.RANGAM, R.Ganapathy Iyer, R.THIAGARAJAN

Judgement

BACHAWAT, J. : The appellant held the post of Deputy Thasildar in the Revenue Department of the Government of Madras. Disciplinary proceedings were started against him on twelve charges of acceptance of illegal gratification during his office as Special Loans Deputy Thasildar, Cuddalore, South Arcot District Disciplinary proceedings were started against three of his subordinates also on similar charges. On May 20, 1949, he was placed under suspension and relieved of his duties. The Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal directed the consolidation and common hearing of the enquiries against he appellant and the other three civil servants. The appellant asked for permission to engage a counsel at the enquiry. By an order dated May 31, 1949, the Tribunal refused to give the permission. The enquiry was held on June 13 , 14 and 15. At the hearing, the other three civil servants were represented by counsel Sri Kalyanasundaram. On June 13 the appellant prayed for an adjournment. The Tribunal declined to grant the adjournment and told the appellant that he was at liberty to engage Sri Kalyanasundaram as his counsel. The appellant thereupon availed himself of the services of Sri Kalyana









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top