SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(SC) 303

J.C.SHAH, K.SUBBA RAO, S.M.SIKRI
K. K. Handique – Appellant
Versus
Member, Board Of Agricultural Income-tax, Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.VISHWANATHA SASTRI, D.N.MUKHERJI, NAUNIT LAL

Judgement

SUBBA RAO, J.: These two appeals raise the question of construction of the relevant provisions of the Assam Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1939 (Act IX of 1939), hereinafter called the Act.

2. One R. K. Handique executed in respect of his properties a deed of trust, dated January 8, 1941, whereunder he appointed four trustees, with an option to co-opt another person as a trustee. He appointed his son, the appellant, as a Managing Trustee. The trustees had to administer the estate and realise the income and make disbursements in the manner prescribed in the trust deed. For the assessment years 1954-55 and 1955-56, the Managing Trustee was assessed to agricultural income-tax on the total income from the trust properties under S. 12 of the Act. The assessee, inter alia, contended that the assessment should have been made under S. 13 of the Act and not under S. 12 thereof. The Income-tax Officer and, on revision, the Commissioner of Taxes, Assam, rejected his contention. At the instance of the assessee, the Member, Board of Agricultural Income-tax, Assam, referred the following question to the High Court of Assam for its decision:

"Whether the assessments for the years 1954-55 and

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top