SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 225

R.S.BACHAWAT, A.K.SARKAR, J.R.MUDHOLKAR
Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab, H. P. , J. and K. and Simla – Appellant
Versus
Chander Bhan Harbhajan Lal – Respondent


Judgement

BACHAWAT, J. [for self and Sarkar, J.]: This appeal by special leave is from an order of the Punjab High Court rejecting an application by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab, under S. 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. On April 21, 1953, 14 partners of the firm of Messrs. Chander Bhan Harbhajan Lal of Rupar (hereinafter referred to as the assessee firm) constituted under the instrument of partnership, dated December 5, 1952, applied to the Income-tax Officer, Project Circle, Ambala, for registration of the firm under S. 26-A of the Indian Income-tax Act. It may be mentioned at this stage that there was another firm of the name of Chander Bhan and Co., of Ferozepore (hereinafter referred to as the Ferozepore firm), consisting of 8 partners and constituted under a deed, dated June 14, 1952 which provided inter alia :

"If any one of the executants enters into business individually or along with another person, all the "partners of the firm shall be entitled to the profit and liable for the loss, accruing from that business according to the shares hereinbefore mentioned."

2. One Gosain Chander Bhan was a partner of both the assessee firm and the Ferozepore firm. In co































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top