SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 311

J.C.SHAH, K.N.WANCHOO, M.HIDAYATULLAH, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, S.M.SIKRI
State Of W. B. – Appellant
Versus
Moti Lal Kanoria – Respondent


Judgement

HIDAYATULLAH, J. : This is an appeal by certificate under Art. 134 (1) (c) of the Constitution, against the judgment of the High Court of Calcutta, dated September 4, 1963 by which the conviction of the respondent Motilal Kanoria under S. 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 and the sentence of fine of Rs. 200 (in default simple imprisonment for one month) imposed by the Presidency Magistrate, 6th Court, Calcutta, were set aside and an acquittal was entered. The facts of the case are not in controversy and may, therefore, be stated briefly. Motilal Kanoria was a director of Lachminarayan Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Calcutta. The Company was managed by a firm of the name of Mukhram Lachminarayan and Motilal Kanoria was one of the partners of the firm. The Company and the Managing Agents had a common address in Calcutta. Motilal Kanoria used to sign on behalf of the Managing Agents and also generally to deal with the affairs of the Company. All transactions in this case were by Motilal Kanoria and he had signed the documents to which reference will be made presently.

2. In February 1955 the Government India approved of the proposal of the Company to manufacture h




















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top