SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 62

P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, J. C. SHAH, K. N. WANCHOO, S. M. SIKRI, M. HIDAYATULLAH
G. Sadanandan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
D.P.Singh, M.K.RAMAMURTHY, M.R.Krishna Pillai, NIREN DEY, R.K.GARG, S.C.AGRAWAL

Judgement

GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J.I.: This petition was heard on the 11th February, 1966; and at the close of the hearing, we allowed the petition and directed that the petitioner should be released forthwith and indicated that our reasons would be pronounced later. Accordingly, our present judgment gives our reasons for the order which has already been passed by us.

2. The petitioner, G. Sadanandan, has been detained by respondent No. 1, the State of Karala, under Rule 30 (1) (b) of the Defence of India Rules. 1962 (hereinafter called "the Rules") by an order passed by it on the 20th October, 1965. The said order recites that from the materials placed before respondent No. 1 it was satisfied that with a view to prevent the petitioner from acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the life of the community, it was necessary to detain him. The said order further shows that under Rule 30 (4) of the Rules, respondent No. 1 had decided that the petitioner be detained in the Central Prison, Trivandrum, under conditions as to maintenance, discipline and punishment of offences and breaches of discipline as provided in the Travancore-Cochin Security





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top