SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. SUBBA RAO, C.J.I., R.S. BACHAWAT AND J.M. SHELAT, JJ.
M/s. R. B. H M. Jute Mills, Katihar and others, Appellants
Versus
Certificate Officer Katihar and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 551 to 554 of 1965, dated 13-10-1966.
Advocates appeared
Mr. A. K. Sen Senior Advocate, Mr. R. C. Prasad, Advocate, with him), for Appellant; Mr. S. P. Varma, Advocate, for Respondents.
Judgment
BACHAWAT, J. : The appellant, a registered dealer under the Bihar Sales Tax Act, was assessed to pay sales tax for four different periods. The arrears of taxes were public demands within S. 3 (6) read with item .3, Sch. 1 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 (B. and O. Act No. 4 of 1914). On the requisition of the Superintendent, Sales Tax, Purnea, the Certificate Officer, Purnea, signed and filed four certificates under S. 6 of the Act stating that the demands were due from the appellant. The certificates were put in execution. In the course of the execution proceedings the appellant paid the principal amounts of the certificates. The Certificate Officer claimed payment of the interest due on the certificates. The appellant filed objections disputing its liability to pay any interest. By his orders, dated March 20 1958, the Certificate Officer dismissed the objections. The appellant filed four writ applications challenging these orders. The Patna High Court dismissed the writ applications. The appellant now appeals to this Court by special leave.
2. A certificate signed and filed under S. of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 has the effect of a decree passed by the Certificate Officer and is executable as such, subject to the provisions of the Act. Section 17 (a) of the Act provides that there shall be recoverable in the proceedings in execution of every certificate filed under the Act, interest upon the public demand to which the certificate relates, at the rate of 61/4 per cent per annum from the date of the signing of the certificate up to the date of the realisation. In view of S. 17 (a), simple interest at the prescribed rate is payable on the principal amount of the certificate, and is recoverable in the proceedings in execution thereof. It was suggested in argument that the certificate-holder has no right to claim interest unless assets are realised by sale or otherwise in execution of the certificate and are disposed of in accordance with S. 32 of the Act. This suggestion is baseless. Section 32 lays down the mode of disposal of the proceeds of execution and the priorities to be observed in such disposal. Out of the proceeds of execution the certificate-holder is entitled to payment of the amount of the certificate interest and costs. His right to claim interest is given by S. 17. Interest on the unpaid principal amount runs from the slate of the certificate anal the certificate-holder is entitled to recover the interest in the execution proceedings. The certificate debtor cannot escape liability to pay the accrued interest by paying the principal amount of the certificate. If any interest has accrued due and is outstanding the certificate-holder is entitled to realise it by executing the certificate. The question as to how much is due from the appellant on account of interest is not in issue in these appeals and we express no opinion on it.
3. The appeals are dismissed with costs one hearing fee.
Appeals dismissed.
For Citation : AIR 1967 SC 400
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.