SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 226

V.BHARGAVA, V.RAMASWAMI, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
Krishnamurthy Alias Tailor Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
Public Prosecutor, Madras – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.RANGAM, A.V.Velayudhan Nair, BISHAN NARAIN, R.THIAGARAJAN

Judgment

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J. : Krishnamurthy alias Krishnan was convicted by the III Presidency Magistrate, Saidapet, Madras, of the offence under S. 4 (1) of the Suppression of Immoral. Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 (Act 104 of 1956), hereinafter called the Act, and was sentenced to nine months rigorous imprisonment, though he was charged with an offence under S. 3 (1) of that Act. He appealed against his conviction to the High Court. The State Government appealed to the High Court against the acquittal of the appellant of the offence under S. 3 (1) of the Act. The High Court dismissed the appellant s appeal but allowed the State appeal and altered the appellant s conviction to one under S. 3 (1) of the Act and sentenced him to two years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 50/-as he was a second offender. It is against this order of the High Court that the appellant appeals, by special leave.

2. The prosecution case, briefly, is that the Assistant Commissioner of Police (Vigilance), P. W. 4, having information that the house occupied by the appellant was being used as a brothel with three girls, Saroja, Ambika and Lakshmi deputed Shanmugham,P.W.2, as a decoy, on August 2













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top