SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 284

G.K.MITTER, K.N.WANCHOO
Chandra Mohini Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Avinuh Prasad Srivastava – Respondent


Advocates:
CHAMPAT RAI, E.C.AGARWAL, J.P.GOYAL, M.V.GOSWAMY, P.C.AGRAWAL, S.P.SINHA

Judgment

WANCHOO, J. : This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court and arises in the following circumstances. A suit was brought by the first respondent, Avinash Prasad Srivastava against the appellant for dissolution of his marriage with her and the grant of a decree of divorce. In the alternative the first, respondent prayed for a decree of judicial separation. His case was that he was married to the appellant on May 27, 1955, and the appellant lived with him for four years and a half. The parties last resided together and cohabited. at Bareilly. A number of allegations of all kinds were made in the petition by the first respondent against the appellant; but it is unnecessary to refer to them, for the first respondent had to bring his case under one or other clause of S. 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, No. 25 of 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), if he wanted a decree of divorce. and under one or other clause of S. 10 if he wanted a decree of judicial separation. It is enough to say that the first respondent s case so far as the prayer for divorce was concerned was based upon Cl. (i) of S. 13 (1), namely, that the appellant was living



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top